Although the lawful rights
of equality between man and women are what brought about this mutation in their
reaction to one another, and though these are what coined the “feminist
movement”, the significance in the movement was the effect that was made on the
interaction between the sexes. Women probably felt the lucidity to wear less
primitive clothing as they began to live independently just as normally as
married. As a result of that civil change, the way that women have been
dressing in the last half century has become more and more revealing, not to
mention masculine on the more obvious level. Previously, women of nearly all
religions and customs in America would wear modest clothing. In addition, it
was only proper to abide together and certainly to remain abstinent until after
marriage. In keeping with a constant “masculinity” among a female-involved
society from generation to generation, where men are born with an inner
masculinity, there is certainly no alteration. Men and women have been and will
continue to be born with an inner nature which is specific to their sex. All
things considered, as well as the fact that men are un-doubtedly both very
visual and the more sex-driven of the two genders, women dressed modestly—primitively—so
as to preserve the men of their society from the dangers of lust by adorning
themselves modestly.
Since that has changed
dramatically, we are simultaneously entering a sexual revolution. As men are
tempted by the immodesty and flippant revealing of female body’s in life, as
constant advertisement, and as a market, they are consistently aware of and
struggling with sexual immorality mentally. Where men were originally perfectly
designed as the protectors of women, they eventually became the owners of women
as property because women have become a symbol for satisfaction first to a delicate,
gentle, dependent. Yet the fact is that men are only responding naturally as
far as their senses go, but this is one of the greatest distorters of that
wonderful design.